Re: Largest PG database known to man!

From: Mark Jones <mark(dot)jones(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Largest PG database known to man!
Date: 2013-10-01 22:00:01
Message-ID: CE7103DC.922%mark.jones@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for your quick response John.

From the limited information, it is mostly relational.
As for usage patterns, I do not have that yet.
I was just after a general feel of what is out there size wise.

Regards


----------------------------------------------------
Mark Jones
Principal Sales Engineer Emea

http://www.enterprisedb.com/

Email: Mark(dot)Jones(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Tel: 44 7711217186
Skype: Mxjones121

On 01/10/2013 22:56, "John R Pierce" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

>On 10/1/2013 2:49 PM, Mark Jones wrote:
>> We are currently working with a customer who is looking at a database
>> of between 200-400 TB! They are after any confirmation of PG working
>> at this size or anywhere near it.
>
>
>is that really 200-400TB of relational data, or is it 199-399TB of bulk
>data (blobs or whatever) interspersed with some relational metadata?
>
>what all is the usage pattern of this data? that determines the
>feasibility of something far more than just the raw size.
>
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the middle of the left coast
>
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Ross 2013-10-01 22:06:37 Re: Largest PG database known to man!
Previous Message John R Pierce 2013-10-01 21:56:07 Re: Largest PG database known to man!