On 10/1/2013 2:49 PM, Mark Jones wrote:
> We are currently working with a customer who is looking at a database
> of between 200-400 TB! They are after any confirmation of PG working
> at this size or anywhere near it.
is that really 200-400TB of relational data, or is it 199-399TB of bulk
data (blobs or whatever) interspersed with some relational metadata?
what all is the usage pattern of this data? that determines the
feasibility of something far more than just the raw size.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast