From: | Blake Smith <blakesmith0(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hstore: Query speedups with Gin index |
Date: | 2013-09-05 18:42:56 |
Message-ID: | CAPxT4eEYDTz2sY+tEwf+nZrp=Z5zxaWgq+Bm_WUhfi7Qf+LkDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Peter,
Thanks for checking the tests. I wasn't able to duplicate your test
results. Did you run the hstore regression tests with the revised patch I
attached in the thread? Attached is the output I got with the latest patch
applied.
Thanks!
Blake
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 09:24 -0500, Blake Smith wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback everyone. I've attached the patch that we are
> > now running in production to service our hstore include queries. We
> > rebuilt the index to account for the on-disk incompatibility. I've
> > submitted the patch to commitfest
> > here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1203
>
> I'm getting the attached failure from the hstore regression test.
>
>
>
>
--
Blake Smith
http://blakesmith.me
@blakesmith
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
regressions.diff | application/octet-stream | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2013-09-05 18:56:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-09-05 18:42:25 | Re: lcr v5 - introduction of InvalidCommandId |