Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause

From: Charles Leifer <coleifer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause
Date: 2018-09-27 18:30:10
Message-ID: CAPukbqwFpGd+Yh_HSXm4mefHNpZ6NfhXk-iLqVvfL3kShPdJuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

I'm running into behavior I don't understand when trying to do an UPSERT
with Postgres. The docs would seem to indicate that the conflict target of
the INSERT statement can be either an index expression or a constraint
name. However, when attempting to reference the constraint name, I get a
"column ... does not exist" error.

My first attempt was to just create a UNIQUE index, which works fine with
the constraint inference:

create table kv (key text, value text, extra text);create unique index
kv_key_value on kv(key, value);insert into kv (key, value) values
('k1', 'v1');-- this works:insert into kv (key, value, extra) values
('k1', 'v1', 'e1')
on conflict (key, value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
-- this does notinsert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1')
on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;

Describing the above table, I see the following under "Indexes:"

"kv_key_value" UNIQUE, btree (key, value)

My second try was to put the unique constraint explicitly in the create
table:

create table kv (
key text,
value text,
extra text,
constraint kv_key_value unique(key, value));

Describing the above table, the output of "Indexes:" is slightly different
("UNIQUE CONSTRAINT" vs "UNIQUE" in previous example):

"kv_key_value" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (key, value)

However I am still unable to specify the constraint name as the conflict
target:

insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1')
on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
ERROR: column "kv_key_value" does not exist
LINE 2: on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=exclude...

Am I misunderstanding something here? I totally get that I can use the
equivalent expression and rely on constraint inference, but I'd like to
know why the constraint name doesn't appear to work when the docs make it
sound like it should?

Thanks so much for your help,

Charlie

PS - StackOverflow question of the above, if anyone wants to answer there:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52542845/postgresql-on-conflict-with-multi-column-unique-constraint-name

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-27 18:45:08 Re: Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-09-27 14:50:28 Re: PG security alerts