Re: Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Charles Leifer <coleifer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause
Date: 2018-09-27 18:45:08
Message-ID: 27450.1538073908@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Charles Leifer <coleifer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm running into behavior I don't understand when trying to do an UPSERT
> with Postgres. The docs would seem to indicate that the conflict target of
> the INSERT statement can be either an index expression or a constraint
> name. However, when attempting to reference the constraint name, I get a
> "column ... does not exist" error.

What I see in the INSERT reference page is

where conflict_target can be one of:

( { index_column_name | ( index_expression ) } [ COLLATE collation ] [ opclass ] [, ...] ) [ WHERE index_predicate ]
ON CONSTRAINT constraint_name

So you can write a parenthesized list of column names, or you can write
"ON CONSTRAINT constraint_name". Given your second example with

create table kv (
key text,
value text,
extra text,
constraint kv_key_value unique(key, value));

either of these work for me:

regression=# insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1')
on conflict (key, value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
INSERT 0 1
regression=# insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1')
on conflict on constraint kv_key_value do update set extra=excluded.extra;
INSERT 0 1

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Leifer 2018-09-27 18:48:50 Re: Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause
Previous Message Charles Leifer 2018-09-27 18:30:10 Trouble referencing a multi-column unique constraint by name in ON CONFLICT clause