Re: [PATCH] Check snapshot argument of index_beginscan and family

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Sven Klemm <sven(at)timescale(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check snapshot argument of index_beginscan and family
Date: 2022-12-06 00:31:04
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvtnsMZ-haoaLOSV43MnUcEdOiTFKG2qLQPXfpV4Pwiqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:18 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 1:30 PM Aleksander Alekseev
> <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback!
> >
> > > I think it's a nice catch and worth fixing. The one thing I don't
> > > agree with is using asserts for handling the error that can appear
> > > because most probably the server is built with assertions off and in
> > > this case, there still will be a crash in this case. I'd do this with
> > > report ERROR. Otherwise, the patch looks right and worth committing.
> >
> > Normally a developer is not supposed to pass NULLs there so I figured
> > having extra if's in the release builds doesn't worth it. Personally I
> > wouldn't mind using ereport() but my intuition tells me that the
> > committers are not going to approve this :)
> >
> > Let's see what the rest of the community thinks.
>
> I think this is harmless assertion patch. I'm going to push this if
> no objections.

Pushed!

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arne Roland 2022-12-06 00:43:30 Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-06 00:22:57 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump