From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Sven Klemm <sven(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Check snapshot argument of index_beginscan and family |
Date: | 2022-12-06 13:44:50 |
Message-ID: | CALT9ZEH+igW74K0NvfrkKnEABwMgxHPY6=Ljjey=xEr3HFP8iw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 04:31, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:18 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 1:30 PM Aleksander Alekseev
> > <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > >
> > > > I think it's a nice catch and worth fixing. The one thing I don't
> > > > agree with is using asserts for handling the error that can appear
> > > > because most probably the server is built with assertions off and in
> > > > this case, there still will be a crash in this case. I'd do this with
> > > > report ERROR. Otherwise, the patch looks right and worth committing.
> > >
> > > Normally a developer is not supposed to pass NULLs there so I figured
> > > having extra if's in the release builds doesn't worth it. Personally I
> > > wouldn't mind using ereport() but my intuition tells me that the
> > > committers are not going to approve this :)
> > >
> > > Let's see what the rest of the community thinks.
> >
> > I think this is harmless assertion patch. I'm going to push this if
> > no objections.
>
> Pushed!
Great, thanks!
Pavel Borisov.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reid Thompson | 2022-12-06 13:47:55 | Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | Dong Wook Lee | 2022-12-06 12:53:13 | Re: pg_basebackup: add test about zstd compress option |