From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP |
Date: | 2018-08-30 10:42:42 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvkp2zua+PisUGBuogkDFe133eeaLg3BxeiqQU1U4m_-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:01 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:05 AM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > At Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:50:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote in <CAPpHfduqEyyjLXCNx_t7K2ugCDGVW7WLKL+zrfDEd5wzkvmg-w(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > > Also I found that this new pg_ctl isn't covered with tests at all. So
> > > I've added very simple tap tests, which ensures that when log file was
> > > renamed, it reappeared again after pg_ctl logrotate. I wonder how
> > > that would work on Windows. Thankfully commitfest.cputube.org have
> > > Windows checking facility now.
> >
> > Thanks for the test. Documentaion and help message looks fine
> > including the changed ordering. (180 seconds retry may be a bit
> > too long but I'm fine with it.)
>
> Thank you for the comments. My idea about retry logic was to provide
> the similar behavior to poll_query_until().
It seems that http://commitfest.cputube.org/ runs only "make check" on
Windows. But my Postgres Pro colleagues checked that tests passed on
32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2008. Also I made some
minor beautifications on code and documentation.
This patch seems to have good shape and generally being quite
harmless. Do we have any objections to committing this?
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_ctl_logrotate_v7.patch | application/octet-stream | 13.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2018-08-30 11:19:14 | Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-08-30 10:24:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module |