Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)

From: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)
Date: 2018-08-30 11:19:14
Message-ID: 20180830201914.c4d67e514d150a71a43870d0@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:18:13 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2018-Aug-30, Yugo Nagata wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:52:58 -0300
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > This should have been listed in the pg11 open items. Please list there
> > > everything that should apply be applied branch 11 before release, so
> > > that they get fixed (or at least considered) before we release.
> > >
> > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Open_Items
> >
> > I don't have the editor privilege now, so I'll add this discussion to the
> > wiki (Fixed issues or Resolve issues?) after I get the privilege.
>
> You're an editor now, though IMO adding it as a resolved issue is
> pointless. I meant if there are any items pending resolution, then
> please add them.

Sure. I will do that from next time.

Regards,
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-08-30 11:25:08 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-08-30 10:42:42 Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP