From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18885: ERROR: corrupt MVNDistinct entry - 2 |
Date: | 2025-04-11 22:30:16 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvhz-p8Wrb0sm+c01Gk2mVR2O-mbbnXDHry4Ax=y1qSTw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, Andrei!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 3:28 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 4/9/25 15:46, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> > The following SQL triggers "ERROR: corrupt MVNDistinct entry", however this
> > seems to be unrelated to a recent bugfix[1] for a similar issue (thus '2' in
> > the $SUBJECT).
> That's my fault.
> We wanted to avoid using of the add_unique_group_var, but forgot it does
> some necessary stuff.
> Here, I attempt to use this routine in the hash join bucket size
> estimation. I transformed it a little, made it more general. Not sure it
> is the best design, but it is debatable.
Thank you for the fix, but it's not enough.
If you would replace a new regression tests query with this, it would
fail with an assertion.
SELECT FROM sb_1 LEFT JOIN sb_2 ON (sb_2.x=sb_1.x) AND (sb_1.x=sb_2.x)
AND (sb_1.y=sb_2.y);
When you use add_unique_group_var() which keeps varinfos unique then
you can no longer expect that varinfos have the same order as
origin_rinfos.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vinod Sridharan | 2025-04-11 23:38:29 | Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2025-04-11 14:41:33 | Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command |