From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command |
Date: | 2025-04-11 14:41:33 |
Message-ID: | 20250411144133.d5.nmisch@google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:18:04PM +0930, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 19:42, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Repro SQL
> =========
> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE a(b boolean , UNIQUE(b)) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS ;
> CREATE TEMP TABLE d() INHERITS(a) ON COMMIT DROP ;
> ANALYSE;
Confirmed. Thanks for the report. This is a variant of the bug that commit
7102070 fixed. Key events:
- The second CREATE sets relhassubclass=t on "a".
- ANALYZE does heap_update() to set relhassubclass=f, since ON COMMIT DROP
removed the child.
- ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS does an empty index build at end-of-xact, which does
an inplace update on the pg_class row of "a". There was no
CommandCounterIncrement() since the heap_update(), hence this error.
Changing to "ANALYSE a" makes the error go away, because
standard_ProcessUtility() does a CCI (added for bug #15631). So I'm inclined
to fix that by putting the CCI here for plain "ANALYSE":
--- a/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
@@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ vacuum(List *relations, VacuumParams *params, BufferAccessStrategy bstrategy,
if (use_own_xacts)
{
PopActiveSnapshot();
+ /* standard_ProcessUtility() does CCI if !use_own_xacts */
+ CommandCounterIncrement();
CommitTransactionCommand();
}
else
> > This error happens in heap_inplace_lock(), and git-bisect says the
> > first bad commit is:
> >
> > a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 is the first bad commit
That commit made it an error to inplace-update an invisible tuple; before
that, we silently lost the inplace update.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-04-11 22:30:16 | Re: BUG #18885: ERROR: corrupt MVNDistinct entry - 2 |
Previous Message | Robins Tharakan | 2025-04-11 12:48:04 | Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command |