| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions |
| Date: | 2022-07-27 05:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfduooGb1L7zHJSUM8zzPU+ETRZCt-PMR0-hhxL2u2Bf0OA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:01 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thank you for caching this. Fixed in the revision attached.
>>
>> Testing subsets of patchsets in cfbot looks like a good idea to me.
>> However, I'm not sure if we always require subsets to be consistent.
>
>
> Hi, hackers!
>
> I've looked through a new v6 of a patchset and find it ok. When applied 0001+0002 only I don't see warnings anymore. Build and tests are successful and Cfbot also looks good. I've marked the patch as RfC.
Thank you, pushed!
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2022-07-27 05:42:28 | Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-07-27 05:30:14 | Re: Refactoring postgres_fdw/connection.c |