| From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions |
| Date: | 2022-07-25 13:00:49 |
| Message-ID: | CALT9ZEHxJbjWN-Ap+i+9K7S3HKgiVjyiNDSPUubF5v4gOVEXBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Thank you for caching this. Fixed in the revision attached.
>
> Testing subsets of patchsets in cfbot looks like a good idea to me.
> However, I'm not sure if we always require subsets to be consistent.
>
Hi, hackers!
I've looked through a new v6 of a patchset and find it ok. When applied
0001+0002 only I don't see warnings anymore. Build and tests are successful
and Cfbot also looks good. I've marked the patch as RfC.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-07-25 13:01:55 | Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?) |
| Previous Message | Japin Li | 2022-07-25 12:04:30 | Re: Typo in misc_sanity.sql? |