From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kartyshov Ivan <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Date: | 2024-08-03 03:07:32 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdu5QN+ZGACS+7foxmr8_nekgA2PA+-G3BuOUrdBLBFb6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 3:45 AM Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I noticed the commit and had a question and a comment.
> There is a small problem in func.sgml in the sentence "After that the changes made of primary". Should be "on primary".
Thank you for spotting this. Will fix.
> In the for loop in WaitForLSNReplay, shouldn't the check for in-recovery be moved up above the call to GetXLogReplayRecPtr?
> If we get promoted while waiting for the timeout we could call GetXLogReplayRecPtr while not in recovery.
This is intentional. After standby gets promoted,
GetXLogReplayRecPtr() returns the last WAL position being replayed
while being standby. So, if standby reached target lsn before being
promoted, we don't have to throw an error.
But this gave me an idea that before the loop we probably need to put
RecoveryInProgress() check after GetXLogReplayRecPtr() too. I'll
recheck that.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-08-03 05:40:00 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Kevin Hale Boyes | 2024-08-03 00:44:58 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |