Re: Removing unneeded self joins

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michał Kłeczek <michal(at)kleczek(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Date: 2024-07-04 03:04:19
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtpLv98ydqRhWAa9QLmh6m_cqmBy5YZT0Scax9FGZrh6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:15 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> in remove_self_join_rel, i have
> ```ChangeVarNodes((Node *) root->parse, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid, 0);```
> which will change the joinlist(RangeTblRef) from (1,2) to (2,2).
> Immediately after this call, I wrote a function (restore_rangetblref)
> to restore the joinlist as original (1,2).
> then remove_rel_from_joinlist won't error out.
> see remove_self_join_rel, restore_rangetblref.

Thank you, now this is clear. Could we add additional parameters to
ChangeVarNodes() instead of adding a new function which reverts part
of changes.

> current mechanism, in this example context,
> SJE can translate ```update test set val = t.val + 1 from test t where
> test.id = t.id;``` as good as to
> ```update test set val = val + 1```.
> if we replace it that way, then this example would result val = 3.
>
> but without SJE,
> ```update test set val = t.val + 1 from test t where test.id = t.id;```
> will result val = 2.
>
> you mentioned the EPQ problem, previously i don't know what that means.

Yes, I guessed so. I should have come with more detailed explanation.

> now i see, I feel like it is quite challenging to resolve it.

Yep. Glad to see we are on the same page.

This is why I think we could leave SJE for target relation of
modification queries for future. I'd like to not devalue SELECT-only
SJE, given that this is a step forward anyway.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2024-07-04 03:05:25 Re: Add new COPY option REJECT_LIMIT
Previous Message Noah Misch 2024-07-04 02:57:07 Re: race condition in pg_class