From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michał Kłeczek <michal(at)kleczek(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |
Date: | 2025-02-24 10:57:41 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdsN8xSmZ+2vKK0m0--DfDJS8oOZsb-k5Qgk6Nv0v1qk9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Andrei!
Thank you for your feedback.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:12 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 23/2/2025 22:15, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > There is my attempt to implement this approach. Getting rid of local
> > variable (and computation of the same value other way) required to
> > change arguments of remove_rel_from_eclass() as well. I'm going to
> > further polish this tomorrow.
> I passed through the patch. It works correctly.
>
> Multiple ifs in a single routine is not ideal.
I would say there is a brachcing anyway. Even if it is inside
adjust_relid_set(). Patch makes it more explicit. Ideal or not, I
don't think it gets worse.
> I have thought about it
> already, and it seems the remove_rel_from_query needs refactoring: when
> I first reused it for self-join removal, we didn't have the 'ojrelid'
> machinery, and it was implemented smoothly.
> Right now, this code contains multiple places where we need to remove
> the outer join relid and separating the removal code for the baserel and
> outer join may simplify the logic and make it safer.
> But the way to do it is not apparent now. May be if we implement a new
> technique of query tree reduction, the approach will become more evident.
Could you, please, elaborate more on what you mean by "new technique
of query tree reduction"?
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-02-24 10:58:52 | RE: pg_copy_logical_replication_slot doesn't copy the failover property |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-02-24 10:54:54 | Re: Remove wal_[sync|write][_time] from pg_stat_wal and track_wal_io_timing |