From: | Felix(dot)徐 <ygnhzeus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2014-01-13 06:51:57 |
Message-ID: | CAPmhLM2XXZ1fX75ECR2aJb7sZUPwu4uFvxUn74T0ho0G9K=oiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I see, thanks.
I'm looking into the source code of statistic part now, and I'm a little
confused about the column "staop" presented in table pg_statistic,
in the pg_statisitc.h, the comment says:
/* ----------------
* To allow keeping statistics on different kinds of datatypes,
* we do not hard-wire any particular meaning for the remaining
* statistical fields. Instead, we provide several "slots" in which
* statistical data can be placed. Each slot includes:
* kind integer code identifying kind of data (see below)
* op OID of associated operator, if needed
* numbers float4 array (for statistical values)
* values anyarray (for representations of data values)
* The ID and operator fields are never NULL; they are zeroes in an
* unused slot. The numbers and values fields are NULL in an unused
* slot, and might also be NULL in a used slot if the slot kind has
* no need for one or the other.
* ----------------
*/
And,
//line 194 : In a "most common values" slot, staop is the OID of the "="
operator used to decide whether values are the same or not.
//line 206 : A "histogram" slot describes the distribution of scalar data.
staop is the OID of the "<" operator that describes the sort ordering.
....
I don't understand the function of staop here, how is it used in optimizer,
is there any example ? thanks!
2014/1/10 Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On 10-Jan-2014, at 19:42, "ygnhzeus" <ygnhzeus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your reply.
> > So correlation is not related to the calculation of selectivity right?
> If I
> > force PostgreSQL not to optimize the join order (by setting
> > join_collapse_limit and from_collapse_limit to 1) , is there any other
> > factor that may affect the structure of execution plan regardless of the
> > data access method.
> >
> > 2014-01-10
> > ________________________________
> > ygnhzeus
> > ________________________________
> > 发件人:Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > 发送时间:2014-01-10 22:00
> > 主题:Re: [GENERAL] How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in
> > PostgreSQL
> > 收件人:"ygnhzeus"<ygnhzeus(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > 抄送:"pgsql-general"<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> >
> >
> >
> > AFAIK, correlation is involved in calculation of the costs that are used
> for
> > deciding the type of access.If the correlation is low, index scan can
> lead
> > to quite some random reads, hence leading to higher costs.
> >
>
> Ah, I forgot to mention this point about how planner uses correlation
> for access method selection.
>
> And selectivity is a function of statistical distribution of column
> values described in pg_statistic by histograms, most common values
> (with their occurrence frequencies), number of distinct values, etc.
> It has nothing to do with correlation.
>
> --
> Amit Langote
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abraham, Danny | 2014-01-13 09:44:33 | Re: PG 924, Windows 2012, error code 487 |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-01-13 04:41:27 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade & tablespaces |