From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit |
Date: | 2022-07-07 08:22:32 |
Message-ID: | CAPmGK16j4yiWnFngGAJM_05ZwPSZWHW0xwb_5YrACd40=AyJyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Jacob,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 3:50 AM Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/12/22 01:46, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 7:39 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I’m planning to commit this as a follow-up patch for commit 04e706d42.
> >
> > Done.
>
> FYI, I think cfbot is confused about the patch under review here. (When
> I first opened the thread I thought the patch had already been committed.)
I should have attached the patch in the previous email.
> For new reviewers: it looks like v8, upthread, is the proposal.
The patch needs rebase due to commits 4036bcbbb, 8c8d307f8 and
82699edbf, so I updated the patch. Attached is a new version, in
which I also tweaked comments a little bit.
Thanks for taking care of this!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v9-postgres-fdw-Add-support-for-parallel-abort.patch | application/octet-stream | 27.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-07-07 08:24:59 | Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2022-07-07 07:54:30 | Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions |