Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Date: 2022-06-30 18:50:41
Message-ID: 45534b4c-6195-ab0a-e71d-23a0a880e8b9@timescale.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/12/22 01:46, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 7:39 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I’m planning to commit this as a follow-up patch for commit 04e706d42.
>
> Done.

FYI, I think cfbot is confused about the patch under review here. (When
I first opened the thread I thought the patch had already been committed.)

For new reviewers: it looks like v8, upthread, is the proposal.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-06-30 19:24:04 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-06-30 18:25:39 Re: Write visibility map during CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL