Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2019-12-10 10:30:34
Message-ID: CAPmGK15r2oeKTAWBjQ3GbxWfmQKE9JBXjLAzG2oD0m4q8w23RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amul,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 3:49 PM amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:08 PM amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached is the rebase version atop the latest master head(2d0fdfaccec).

Thanks for that!

> I have been through your changes proposed in [1] -- the changes make sense to me &
> I didn't see any unobvious behaviour in testing as well.

Thanks for reviewing! I'll merge the changes into the main patch,
then. I don't see any issues in the latest version, but I think we
need to polish the patch, so I'll do that.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2019-12-10 10:55:50 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-12-10 10:12:34 Re: Online checksums verification in the backend