| From: | Lucas Viecelli <lviecelli199(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: warning to publication created and wal_level is not set to logical |
| Date: | 2019-03-26 12:36:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAPjy-56B46Vqc06gxZ1qx7upstub_kWRgB94H4ZHNwsKavXz0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> One idea that might be useful is to have walsenders refuse to transmit
> >> any logical-replication data if they see wal_level is too low. That
> >> would get users' attention pretty quickly.
>
> > They do:
>
I checked this before creating the patch
>
> Oh, OK, then this seems like it's basically covered already. I think
> the original suggestion to add a WARNING during CREATE PUBLICATION
> isn't unreasonable. But we don't need to do more than that (and it
> shouldn't be higher than WARNING).
>
Okay, I think it will improve understanding of new users.
Since everything is fine, thank you all for the comments
--
Atenciosamente.
*Lucas Viecelli*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-03-26 12:41:38 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-03-26 12:31:15 | Re: pgsql: Get rid of backtracking in jsonpath_scan.l |