| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabrizio(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | srkrishna1(at)aol(dot)com |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Date: | 2018-10-23 20:53:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAPfkCSAPrPH7HihKPgmk1uAYiNFM+12NV5EmifedmK5xZhrLWw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Em ter, 23 de out de 2018 às 17:48, Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)aol(dot)com>
escreveu:
>
> I agree but this is the key:
>
> "Savepoints are an important database tool for tracking and recovering
individual transactions. On Prime Day, an excessive number of savepoints
was created, and Amazon's Aurora software wasn't able to handle the
pressure, slowing down the overall database performance, the report said."
>
If it's true (I don't know Oracle enough to have a clear opinion) then they
should think better their database transactions design/architecture and not
just move...
And to improve our Savepoint infrastructure we need a more detailed
information.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-10-23 20:55:24 | Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2018-10-23 20:49:29 | Re: Oracle vs PG |