Re: Oracle vs PG

From: Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)aol(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PG
Date: 2018-10-23 20:47:43
Message-ID: 6DD461F9-7FF5-4A54-AB04-9507648D76CE@aol.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either direction.

I agree but this is the key:

"Savepoints are an important database tool for tracking and recovering individual transactions. On Prime Day, an excessive number of savepoints was created, and Amazon's Aurora software wasn't able to handle the pressure, slowing down the overall database performance, the report said."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2018-10-23 20:49:29 Re: Oracle vs PG
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2018-10-23 20:45:36 Re: Oracle vs PG