Re: alternative back-end block formats

From: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alternative back-end block formats
Date: 2014-01-28 17:28:00
Message-ID: CAPfS4ZwQJQuOKGMCyjH+R=f8fzuqNbDfYfK=z1kFRzYPHZYfKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> There are a couple of really huge issues that would have to be argued out
> before any progress could be made.
>

Is this something that people want to spend time on right now? As I
mentioned earlier, I'm game. But it doesn't sound like I'll get very far
without adult supervision.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-01-28 17:29:25 Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-01-28 17:26:56 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe