From: | Amitabh Kant <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Achilleas Mantzios <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm |
Date: | 2025-04-09 01:50:56 |
Message-ID: | CAPTAQBL65BFbfTyiZQ7OZxryUXtgDteOwBoZjQhYNNtZpD6ysQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:29 PM Achilleas Mantzios <
a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 8/4/25 20:37, Amitabh Kant wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:40 PM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <
> a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> <snip>
>> timescaledb seemed mature, but also exotic, allow me the term. No way to
>> use native logical replication, shortage of options to run on premise or
>> self hosted, which leaves us with those options :
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
> I cannot comment on the applicability of timescaledb in your context, but
> running it on premise/self-hosted has posed no problems, at least on
> Debian.
>
> If I understood your query incorrectly, please ignore.
>
> Thank you, I meant the paid/supported service not the community version.
> Which of the two do you use?
>
>
>
I use the community version.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brent Wood | 2025-04-09 02:23:51 | Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-04-08 20:33:50 | Re: Postgres_fdw- User Mapping with md5-hashed password |