Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm

From: Brent Wood <pcreso(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com, Achilleas Mantzios <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm
Date: 2025-04-09 02:23:51
Message-ID: 1926549069.3386804.1744165431041@mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I also use the free community edition on internal servers, but under Ubuntu. No issues and very good performance.
Brent Wood...

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 13:51, Amitabh Kant<amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:29 PM Achilleas Mantzios <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:


On 8/4/25 20:37, Amitabh Kant wrote:

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:40 PM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
Hi
<snip>
timescaledb seemed mature, but also exotic, allow me the term. No way to
use native logical replication, shortage of options to run on premise or
self hosted, which leaves us with those options :

<snip>


  I cannot comment on the applicability of timescaledb in your context, but running it on premise/self-hosted has posed no problems, at least on Debian. 
If I understood your query incorrectly, please ignore.
Thank you, I meant the paid/supported service not the community version. Which of the two do you use?

I use the community version.  

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KK CHN 2025-04-09 05:51:45 Re: PgBackRest fails due to filesystem full
Previous Message Amitabh Kant 2025-04-09 01:50:56 Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm