Re: Autovacuum of independent tables

From: Michael Holzman <michaelholzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum of independent tables
Date: 2020-09-08 15:38:34
Message-ID: CAPNViJoWNJM=rwWfkGoxT=TJ37jDm3jf1gZvc6muEv33gFd_jQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:33 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:

>
> Per his session list, 11.2.
>
11.2 is on my personal testing machine. The real tests run with 12.1

Oh, now *cursors* is definitely something I didn't think of. And especially
> in the context of ODBC, I wonder if it might be creating cursors
> transparently, and that this somehow causes the problems.
>
> Michael, do you know if that might be the case? Or try enabling
> log_statements to check if it is?
>
This is very interesting. I'll try to check it. I'll post here a reply if
we do have open cursors. Thanks.

--
Regards,
Michael Holzman

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J . Mageshwaran 2020-09-09 04:59:43 Network performance optimization
Previous Message Michael Holzman 2020-09-08 15:34:09 Re: Autovacuum of independent tables