From: | Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() |
Date: | 2023-02-05 08:57:09 |
Message-ID: | CAPF61jDKLeQe2v5xg8S8BZvu3f+YBoXKx26brq3_aqkCEHEkYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:20 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 8:24 AM Himanshu Upadhyaya
> <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Before this we stop the node by "$node->stop;" and then only we progress
> to
> > manual corruption. This will abort all running/in-progress transactions.
> > So, if we create an in-progress transaction and comment "$node->stop;"
> > then somehow all the code that we have for manual corruption does not
> work.
> >
> > I think it is required to stop the server and then only proceed for
> manual corruption?
> > If this is the case then please suggest if there is a way to get an
> in-progress transaction
> > that we can use for manual corruption.
>
> How about using a prepared transaction?
>
> Thanks, yes it's working fine with Prepared Transaction.
Please find attached the v9 patch incorporating all the review comments.
--
Regards,
Himanshu Upadhyaya
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v9-0001-Implement-HOT-chain-validation-in-verify_heapam.patch | application/x-patch | 23.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-02-05 09:22:05 | Re: what's the meaning of key? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-02-05 05:17:39 | Re: proposal: psql: psql variable BACKEND_PID |