| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() |
| Date: | 2023-01-31 13:50:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYNqimmA0ziZVQhwcUSx2+bWOuvtg0LwR8=3_tSg7abyg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 8:24 AM Himanshu Upadhyaya
<upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Before this we stop the node by "$node->stop;" and then only we progress to
> manual corruption. This will abort all running/in-progress transactions.
> So, if we create an in-progress transaction and comment "$node->stop;"
> then somehow all the code that we have for manual corruption does not work.
>
> I think it is required to stop the server and then only proceed for manual corruption?
> If this is the case then please suggest if there is a way to get an in-progress transaction
> that we can use for manual corruption.
How about using a prepared transaction?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Onur Tirtir | 2023-01-31 14:00:05 | [PATCH] Report the query string that caused a memory error under Valgrind |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2023-01-31 13:40:05 | Re: [PATCH] Fix old thinko in formula to compute sweight in numeric_sqrt(). |