Re: CONCAT function equivalent

From: Fabian Santiago <fabian(dot)santiago(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CONCAT function equivalent
Date: 2014-05-18 01:01:33
Message-ID: CAP4E923EfP=PcGd34u9HefZovxDVDzwmrNH6ihDmFiJz0tqG8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks David. You were right. It is what I should have expected. I figured
it all out finally. Thanks for your guidance.

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, David G Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Fabian Santiago wrote
> > It created one line in the column with everything strung together.
>
> And why would you expect anything different? If you want embedded newlines
> you need to add them yourself during the concatenation.
>
> See my post on the -novice list where you also posted this same original
> question.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/CONCAT-function-equivalent-tp5804325p5804370.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>

--
Sincerely,

Fabian S.
862-432-2373

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabian Santiago 2014-05-18 01:02:33 Re: CONCAT function equivalent
Previous Message Fabian Santiago 2014-05-18 00:01:56 Re: CONCAT function equivalent