From: | Marcos Cano <mcano(at)stsa(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | "Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ)" <Robert(dot)Burgholzer(at)deq(dot)virginia(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue |
Date: | 2013-06-20 18:27:20 |
Message-ID: | CAP2RsaL_3sFPmFFOnhXHyBq6+Zn747_KP275JJ9yybp2aPK+SA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
thank you very much
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ) <
Robert(dot)Burgholzer(at)deq(dot)virginia(dot)gov> wrote:
> Marcos,
> This answer might be best put over on the postGIS listserv, but I will
> suggest a couple of strategies based on some differing assumptions and
> certainties.
>
> One certainty - it seems that you absolutely have to have some form of
> PostGIS installed in order to perform the postgreSQL upgrade using
> pg_upgrade.
> One variable - whether or not you will have to do the "hard upgrade"
> required by the postGIS version when doing the standard PostgreSQL upgrade.
> In other words -- is the postgreSQL upgrade essentially doing the same as
> the "hard upgrade"?
> If YES - then install postgis 1.3.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade,
> then do the pgis hard upgrade
> If NO - install postgis 2.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade
>
> This is a very relevant case study, one that I myself will be going
> through very very shortly here so I am interested to follow your progress
> and assist in whatever way I might.
>
> Regards,
> r.b.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2013-06-21 07:54:16 | Re: excessive WAL activity |
Previous Message | Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ) | 2013-06-20 17:01:32 | Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue |