Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue

From: Marcos Cano <mcano(at)stsa(dot)info>
To: "Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ)" <Robert(dot)Burgholzer(at)deq(dot)virginia(dot)gov>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue
Date: 2013-06-20 18:27:20
Message-ID: CAP2RsaL_3sFPmFFOnhXHyBq6+Zn747_KP275JJ9yybp2aPK+SA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

thank you very much

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ) <
Robert(dot)Burgholzer(at)deq(dot)virginia(dot)gov> wrote:

> Marcos,
> This answer might be best put over on the postGIS listserv, but I will
> suggest a couple of strategies based on some differing assumptions and
> certainties.
>
> One certainty - it seems that you absolutely have to have some form of
> PostGIS installed in order to perform the postgreSQL upgrade using
> pg_upgrade.
> One variable - whether or not you will have to do the "hard upgrade"
> required by the postGIS version when doing the standard PostgreSQL upgrade.
> In other words -- is the postgreSQL upgrade essentially doing the same as
> the "hard upgrade"?
> If YES - then install postgis 1.3.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade,
> then do the pgis hard upgrade
> If NO - install postgis 2.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade
>
> This is a very relevant case study, one that I myself will be going
> through very very shortly here so I am interested to follow your progress
> and assist in whatever way I might.
>
> Regards,
> r.b.
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2013-06-21 07:54:16 Re: excessive WAL activity
Previous Message Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ) 2013-06-20 17:01:32 Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue