| From: | "Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ)" <Robert(dot)Burgholzer(at)deq(dot)virginia(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marcos Cano <mcano(at)stsa(dot)info>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue |
| Date: | 2013-06-20 17:01:32 |
| Message-ID: | 77F5F8FA4B407F43BFCFD3FC3478969147C803@COVMSGCES-MBX01 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Marcos,
This answer might be best put over on the postGIS listserv, but I will suggest a couple of strategies based on some differing assumptions and certainties.
One certainty - it seems that you absolutely have to have some form of PostGIS installed in order to perform the postgreSQL upgrade using pg_upgrade.
One variable - whether or not you will have to do the "hard upgrade" required by the postGIS version when doing the standard PostgreSQL upgrade. In other words -- is the postgreSQL upgrade essentially doing the same as the "hard upgrade"?
If YES - then install postgis 1.3.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade, then do the pgis hard upgrade
If NO - install postgis 2.x on your 9.2.4 then use pg_upgrade
This is a very relevant case study, one that I myself will be going through very very shortly here so I am interested to follow your progress and assist in whatever way I might.
Regards,
r.b.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcos Cano | 2013-06-20 18:27:20 | Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue |
| Previous Message | Marcos Cano | 2013-06-20 16:35:06 | Re: PG_UPGRADE major issue |