| From: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minmax indexes |
| Date: | 2014-08-06 20:06:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAP-rdTZZ_25FA51LGbykRP_K2fg73Dn0Jd=MYanA7=gagxhrNg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-08-06 Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> So, I like blockfilter a lot. I change my vote to blockfilter ;)
+1 for blockfilter, because it stresses the fact that the "physical"
arrangement of rows in blocks matters for this index.
Nicolas
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Cloos | 2014-08-06 20:07:07 | Re: PostrgeSQL vs oracle doing 1 million sqrts am I doing it wrong? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-08-06 19:46:18 | Re: PostrgeSQL vs oracle doing 1 million sqrts am I doing it wrong? |