| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minmax indexes |
| Date: | 2014-08-07 13:53:00 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+Eghz2adg5a_kLWSP6UvqMm5LaVVPKgByFM3nrFr2Zw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Nicolas Barbier
<nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2014-08-06 Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> So, I like blockfilter a lot. I change my vote to blockfilter ;)
>
> +1 for blockfilter, because it stresses the fact that the "physical"
> arrangement of rows in blocks matters for this index.
I don't like that quite as well as summary, but I'd prefer either to
the current naming.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-08-07 14:04:47 | Re: Append to a GUC parameter ? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-07 13:52:27 | Re: Fixed redundant i18n strings in json |