From: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)? |
Date: | 2012-11-07 18:44:12 |
Message-ID: | CAP=oouG8VKubS78DSRBNXyY463VhtaQhu64kNRiHDQEMt1c0mA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to
>> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the
>> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its
>> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has
>> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated.
>>
>> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just
>> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in
>> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that
>> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there
>> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time?
>>
>> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal
>> behavior, or if something might not be right.
>
> Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to
> improve upgrades for clusters with many objects.
about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Broers | 2012-11-07 20:42:33 | bumping all sequence ids in a schema |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-11-07 18:42:32 | Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)? |