From: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL - General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload? |
Date: | 2012-10-22 22:02:13 |
Message-ID: | CAP=oouFps-WP2jizSv+UVEeM04ZqZ7E2hw7L5y-dcUEvHCOWwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
pg_upgrade has worked fine for several releases. I believe that the
only time when pg_upgrade isn't a viable option is for some types of
GIST indices.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was just looking at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-2.html and it
> mentioned that a dump/reload cycle was required to upgrade from a previous
> release. I just got done telling some of my coworkers that PG had been
> bitten by this enough times that they were done with it. Am I wrong? Is
> this normal?
>
> I see that pg_upgrade is an option. Having never used how long should I
> expect pg_upgrade to take? Obviously we'll measure it in our environment,
> but it'd be nice to have a ballpark figure.
>
> Nik
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama(at)gmail(dot)com
LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2012-10-22 22:17:19 | Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload? |
Previous Message | Nikolas Everett | 2012-10-22 21:55:07 | 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload? |