From: | Alexander Kjäll <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: github purchased by micro$oft |
Date: | 2018-06-05 16:29:27 |
Message-ID: | CAOuTi9XUndKc1w9E9+5Fz5Gf5oHO7y-fAorSz0izKkti+MPqmQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I don't have much fear that microsoft will break github in the
sort-mid term and I don't have a strong opinion about moving.
Just wanted to point out that gitlab now offers their Ultimate and
Gold packages for free to open source projects
https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/05/gitlab-ultimate-and-gold-free-for-education-and-open-source/
best regards
Alexander Kjäll
Den mån 4 juni 2018 kl 23:48 skrev Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> Well, it's too early to know the new direction of Github, and I don't really think that Microsoft will mess up Github (at least not in the short-mid term).
>
> But anyway I like the idea of leave github for gitlab based the following reasons:
> * Github is not open source, GitLab is.
> * GitLab uses and promotes PostgreSQL, a perfect match to a PostgreSQL project.
> * Big projects like GNOME choose GitLab.
> * A more integrated CI and CD.
>
> The only issue I see is that all the travis jobs must be "ported" to gitlab-ci.yml (which might be easy or difficult since pgjdbc uses some tweaks in jobs).
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:09 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> There is already a project on gitlab if we want to leave github.
>>
>> I'm not suggesting we do, but if things go south with the new owner we may want to consider it
>>
>>
>> Dave Cramer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2018-06-05 19:43:29 | reskinning the jdbc website |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2018-06-05 08:50:14 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] eb5c8f: chore: update gettext plugin, sort po files |