Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2021-09-21 11:53:54
Message-ID: CAOgcT0P0v8Buo2cZCdCkow=vir7vNgpQ9WSA3pVfqx5BrOgDoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for the newer set of the patches Robert!

I was wondering if we should change the bbs_buffer_length in bbsink to
be size_t instead of int, because that's what most of the compression
libraries have their length variables defined as.

Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:42 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:19 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Seems like nothing has been done about the issue reported in [1]
> >
> > This one line change shall fix the issue,
>
> Oops. Try this version.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-09-21 12:35:30 Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-21 11:42:20 Re: row filtering for logical replication