| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 16:14:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+m-q8VOPsFxB3D-CWf-T057h4XLqVPvCTudXyAj7-9vpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:02 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> wrote:
> How does the proposal with a loadable module affect a static libpq.a?
The currently proposed patch would have you package and install a
separate .so module implementing OAuth, which the staticlib would load
once when needed. Similarly to how you still have to somehow
dynamically link your static app against Curl.
As a staticlib user, how do you feel about that?
> I have not tried, yet, but is my assumption correct, that I could build
> a libpq.a with oauth/curl support on current HEAD?
Yes.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-04-08 16:17:03 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-04-08 16:14:32 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |