| From: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 16:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 96b5b38b-2fac-409f-b922-f7fd653bf847@technowledgy.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion:
> The above is discussing a patch to split this into its own loadable
> module.
Wasn't sure where to put this exactly, the thread is long and I couldn't
find any discussion around it:
How does the proposal with a loadable module affect a static libpq.a?
I have not tried, yet, but is my assumption correct, that I could build
a libpq.a with oauth/curl support on current HEAD?
If yes, would that still be an option after the split?
Thanks,
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2025-04-08 16:02:46 | Re: Feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-04-08 16:00:27 | Re: Feature freeze |