| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Date: | 2024-05-16 21:36:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+kk4Y25neGshagcLCmCj3NGmtAujY0oMU+9B9Le_aNziw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:29 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> If no one, including the author (new or otherwise) is interested in
> shepherding a particular patch, what chance does it have of ever getting
> committed?
That's a very different thing from what I think will actually happen, which is
- new author posts patch
- community member says "use commitfest!"
- new author registers patch
- no one reviews it
- patch gets automatically booted
- community member says "register it again!"
- new author says ಠ_ಠ
Like Tom said upthread, the issue isn't really that new authors are
somehow uninterested in their own patches.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-16 21:38:08 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-16 21:35:45 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |