Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-16 21:38:08
Message-ID: 6d4aaccd-f89d-4b04-9595-4bd7090e7e8a@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.05.24 23:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it'd be great if we could separate "I'm actively reviewing
> this" from "I'm interested in this". As a bonus, adding yourself
> to the "interested" list would be a fine proxy for the thumbs-up
> or star markers mentioned upthread.
>
> If those were separate columns, we could implement some sort of
> aging scheme whereby somebody who'd not commented for (say)
> a week or two would get quasi-automatically moved from the "active
> reviewer" column to the "interested" column, whereupon it wouldn't
> be impolite for someone else to sign up for active review.

Yes, I think some variant of this could be quite useful.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-16 21:43:19 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2024-05-16 21:36:53 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose