| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 17:44:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+kMctMbBHUTRhHgyxizr9nydm=rOk+N45VhZQ7AzNx8qA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> wrote:
> This means that shipping another .so file will not happen with this approach. Assuming OAuth will be picked up by some of the bigger providers, that would... make me feel quite bad about it, actually.
It occurs to me that I didn't respond to this point explicitly. I
would like to avoid making your life harder.
Would anybody following along be opposed to a situation where
- dynamiclib builds go through the dlopen() shim
- staticlib builds always rely on statically linked symbols
Or do we need to be able to mix and match?
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-08 17:51:22 | Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-08 17:42:20 | Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects |