Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date: 2025-04-08 17:42:20
Message-ID: 4054965.1744134140@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Unless I'm missing something, we don't seem to have had any dependency
> handling before commit 12a53c7. Was that broken before we moved to SQL
> commands?

Sounds like it :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-04-08 17:44:58 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-04-08 17:41:26 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects