| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 17:04:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=fhzr4Mm5MVwFa+pmwn-uSrPpjfYNfQ9EPBLh8xPV3cA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:57 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> wrote:
> if it's really the case that cURL is that much worse
(it is not, but I am sympathetic to the argument that if you don't use
it, you don't need it in the process space)
> However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the
> ship has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here
> anymore.
I think this line of argument is unlikely to find traction. Upthread
there were people asking if we could maybe split out other
possibly-unused dependencies in the future, like Kerberos.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-04-08 17:06:33 | Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-04-08 17:03:10 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |