| From: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 17:10:07 |
| Message-ID: | 214ec3cc-7531-4360-8103-663581d2149f@technowledgy.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion:
>> However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the
>> ship has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here
>> anymore.
> I think this line of argument is unlikely to find traction. Upthread
> there were people asking if we could maybe split out other
> possibly-unused dependencies in the future, like Kerberos.
Well, yes, that's kind of what I'm saying. There shouldn't be a special
case for cURL, but those other deps should be handled equally as well.
And if that means making libpq modular at run-time, then this should be
planned and built with all deps, and other use-cases (like static
linking) in mind - and not like it is right now.
Best,
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-04-08 17:12:48 | Re: Finalizing read stream users' flag choices |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-08 17:07:09 | Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects |