From: | Vinicius Santos <vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Date: | 2012-07-18 13:13:07 |
Message-ID: | CAOTD_5FJqReCbdqWKqdKrZysQOtzVe_c4Qif1xV0wZzLZ+vB_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
>
> Not really. The panel you've used for the server name is fixed width.
> As I mentioned before, on some, if not all platforms, you can only
> have 1 variable width panel. That's one of the reasons we've avoided
> putting extra info in there before, that isn't a clearly defined
> width.
>
It's true. You're right.
> It is somewhere else already. You can see it from the treeview - which
> is why I think it's redundant anyway. The fact that noone else has
> ever complained (that I can recall) also suggests it's not an issue
> for others.
>
I agree that isn't an issue, but I think that this feature would facilitate a
bit when you have multiple objects.
But, this implementation will really cause an issue. So is better not to do.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-07-18 13:31:57 | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2012-07-18 12:56:30 | Re: More information about the selected objects |