From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Vinicius Santos <vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Date: | 2012-07-18 12:56:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozAjR2UaDmmDRWtudtwtVnDoMd0DfLpYoM--psExgmPSg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Vinicius Santos
<vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Really. Your servers have very long names. This should happen only at lower
> resolutions.
Not really. The panel you've used for the server name is fixed width.
As I mentioned before, on some, if not all platforms, you can only
have 1 variable width panel. That's one of the reasons we've avoided
putting extra info in there before, that isn't a clearly defined
width.
> And if we put a configuration option? The user decides if he wants this
> option or not.
>
> Or to put this information somewhere else, but where?
It is somewhere else already. You can see it from the treeview - which
is why I think it's redundant anyway. The fact that noone else has
ever complained (that I can recall) also suggests it's not an issue
for others.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vinicius Santos | 2012-07-18 13:13:07 | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Previous Message | Vinicius Santos | 2012-07-18 12:50:27 | Re: More information about the selected objects |