Re: compliance with 21 cfr part 11

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robin <robinstc(at)live(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compliance with 21 cfr part 11
Date: 2013-12-05 06:57:35
Message-ID: CAOR=d=3r3XmBBVwsxTVtRe4On7FCC7=mZC1K-3gZQozbRoaVOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Robin <robinstc(at)live(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> I have built big nationwide health databases, and other secure systems
> requiring traceback and auditability.
>
> The more you are able to make the required processes transparent to the end
> user, the happier they are and the fewer problems you have from a user
> acceptance perspective.

Well one of the example triggers in the plpgsql documentation is an
audit trigger. So you can do it, but you kinda have to build parts of
it yourself.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 吕晓旭 2013-12-05 08:46:33 Fwd: Help!Why CPU Usage and LoadAverage Jump up Suddenly
Previous Message Richard Dunks 2013-12-05 05:08:46 Re: Need help with upsert