From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multi Master Replication |
Date: | 2013-12-18 23:12:52 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=3Ot0aVhYprimLzwkWgYwGwAQkBeyxALwthJVZdFSLRVg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 1:31 AM, itishree sukla wrote:
>>
>> I need suggestion about setting up multi master replication between two
>> postgresql server place two different geographical area. As i know using
>> some third party tool like Bucardo,RubyRep it can be achievable, not sue
>> which is the good one to use. If any one can provide me some online
>> documentation links, it will help me as well.
>
>
> that sort of replication is very problematic. its virtually impossible to
> maintain ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) and maintain
> any semblance of performance.
>
> question for you, what do you expect to happen if the communications link
> between the servers is interrupted, and updates continue to be sent to both
> servers?
When people start talking multi-master replication my first response
is to ask what problem you're trying to solve. Sometimes MM Rep IS the
answer. But quite often it's not the best one for your problem. So to
OP I'd ask what problem they're trying to solve.
--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Abraham | 2013-12-18 23:14:23 | Re: Question(s) about crosstab |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2013-12-18 23:02:52 | Re: Question(s) about crosstab |